Thomas C. Brandstrader, Criminal Defense Attorney ~ Appeals
Counsel has been a panel attorney for the Office of the State Appellate Defender’s office since 2002 and has authored approximately twenty five additional briefs in that capacity.
People v Yates No. 53482 Case No. 77 4339 (death penalty case); People v Marques No. 80 2359 People v Roberts No. 80-2570 People v Webb 1-88-714; People v Shelly 1-88-921; People v Regard 1-88-2383 Heard in the Supreme Court No. 69124 Village v Lake Zurich v Keefe 2- 88-1199; People v Figiel 1-88-3373; People v Caban 1-89-2870; People v Greco 90-0396; People v Sweeney 1-90-0631; People v Mitchell 2-91-0517; People v Espinoza 1-91-1217; People v Marquez 1-91-2802; People v Brown 1-91-2414; People v Del Grosso 1-91-3971; People v Separza 1-92-1146; People v Mounts 1-92-2314; People v Uriostegui 1-92-3046; People v Oracko 4-93-0751; People v Lagowski 1-93-1853; People v Baby etal. 1-94-1991-1999; People v Brown 1-93-3430; People v Cooper 1-93-3431; People v Stokes 1-93-3867; People v Sutton 1-94-0000; People v Alexander 1-94-0813; People v Jackson 1-94-2304; People v Arthur 1-94-4456; People v McMahon 2-95-0143; People v Pittas 1-95-0457; People v Ewing 1-95-0877; People v Beyah 1 -95-0320; People v Henricksen 2-95-0951; People v Kwon 1-95-1492; People v Heuermann 1-95-1637; People v Heuermann 1-95-1638; People v Diaz 1-95-1820; People v Salazar and Corral 1-95-1895; People v Clark 1-95-2605; People v Childs 1-95-2933 ; People v Boer 1-95-2728; People v Thompson 1-95-3272; People v Cole 1-95-3300; People v Mc Dade 1-95-3510; People v Hodel 1-95-3555; People v Gilchrist 1-96-0051; People v Almond 1-96-1114; People v Johnson 1-96-1288; People v Warren 1-96-1563; People v Pittman 1-96-1772; People v Hudson 2-97-1266; People v Anson 1-97-2450; People v Hinton 1-97-3922; People v Ruiz 1-97-2822; People v Barbary 2-98-0390; People v Bennett 2-98-0408; People v Brackens 2-98-0630; People v Carey 1-98-0770; People v Ford 1-98-2433; People v Richardson 1-98-3404; People v West 1-98-3707; People v Jones aka James 1-98-4509; People v Kohout 2-99-0205; People v Ruiz 1-99-1372; People v Brown 1-99-3459; People v Cervantes 1- 00-3865; People v O’Connor 1-01-0067; People v Edwards 1-00-0016; People v Snyder 2-01-0696; People v La Point 2-02-1002; People v Bressendorf 4-02-0625; People v Jackson 1-02-1533; People v Orbe 1-03-0997; People v Patterson 5-03-0535; People v Cervantes 1-03-1165; People v Frawley 1-03-3174; People v Beierwaltes 2-03-1242; People v Ephraim 1-03-3638; People v Klebanowski 1-04-0119; People v Moser 2-04-0477; People v Alcantar 1-04-1005; People v Kramarenko 05-0127; People v Lucas 05-3222; People v Del Prete 05-0868; People v Bajdo 05-2797; People v Suastegui 05-2429; People v Ruhl 03-0920; People v Duan 05-0515; People v Hopkins 06-1312; People v Nelson 06-0312; People v Goldman 06-0344; People v Samanta, 06-3381;People v Beutler 07-1077; People v Bryant 07-2220; People v Harrison 07-0452; People v Jordan 07-2116; People v Alvardo, 07-2232; People v Aguilar 08-1015; People v Leonard, 08-1800; People v Wiek, 08-1810; People v Walls, 08-2174; People v Makiel, 08-0921; People v Gomez, 08-2266; People v Fortner, 08-1710; People v Vega 08-1532; People v Pulido, 09-2464; People v Foy, 09-0588; People v Samanta, 09-0589; People v Zavala, 09-1593; People v Dorrough, 09-0327; People v Lembke, 10-0102.
